course
outline

requirements

grading

undergraduate
students

topics
&
readings

 

Political Science 515

Tolerance & Multiculturalism

Rob Groves and
Dimitrios Panopalis, with
Don Carmichael

First Term, 2000-2001
Wednesdays, 2-5 pm



Course Outline

Due to the shortage of senior and graduate courses in political theory, this course is being added to the first term offerings - at quite short notice.

In brief - this will be a seminar on topics of tolerance and multiculturalism, given by Rob Groves, Dimitrios Panopalis, and me. Rob will do a series of seminars (with readings) on tolerance, then Dimitrios will do the same on multiculturalism, and I will wrap it up some closing sessions. All three of us will attend and participate in all sessions.

The rough idea is that it will be an informal, working seminar among the three of us - plus any others who want to take part. I expect that several other grad students will sit in on it informally. In fact it was originally conceived as an informal grad seminar but, given the shortage of graduate courses we've decided to do it so that students can get credit for it if they want.


Requirements.

Participants for credit will be asked to contribute three short papers: two during the term (5-7 pp) and a slightly longer paper (7-10 pp) towards or at the end of the term. Of the three papers, there should be at least one on each of the two main themes; the third can be on either theme. Participants are invited (but not required) to present one of these papers as a "seminar"paper, for class discussion.


Grading:

My strong preference is that grading should be pass/fail. However it seems that this is not workable administratively and that a stanine grade must be given. Other things being equal, I suggest that each of the essays count equally at 30% with 10% for oral contributions. However, in view of the nature of the seminar, I am willing to vary or to tailor the grading to meet individual needs, and participants are strongly encouraged to discuss variations with me.


Undergraduate students are welcome to take the seminar. Although graduate and undergraduate students will all be enrolled in the same course number (515), they will be evaluated differently. Everyone will do the same work; but grad students will be expected to do the same work better.




Topics and Readings


Sept 13 -- First meeting: Course Organization

Much of the recent literature on multiculturalism and toleration assumes a "liberal" framework dominated by the work of John Rawls and some (eg communitarian) criticisms of it. This opening session will survey this framework. The last part of the session will consider some particular problems of multiculturalism and toleration.

Required:

S. Mulhall and A. Swift, Liberals and Communitarians, introduction (pp 1-33), chs 5-6.
Nussbaum, "Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism", in For Love of Country (ed Josh Cohen)

Recommended:

"Analytic Political Philosophy" in The Cambridge Anthology of Contemporary Political Philosophy

Rawls, "Justice as Fairness" (1957).

Rawls, "Justice as Fairness: Political, Not Metaphysical" (1985).

 

Sept 27 - Tolerance 1: The Concept of Toleration

Required:

John Horton, "Toleration as a Virtue"

Ernesto Garzon Valdes, "Some Remarks on the Concept of Toleration"

Peter Nicholson, "Toleration as Moral Ideal"

George P Fletcher, "The Case for Tolerance"

Thomas K Hearn Jr, "On Tolerance"

C. Kording, "Concepts of Toleration"

Robert Paul Churchhill, "On the Difference between Non-Moral and Moral Concepts of Tolerance"

Richard Vernon and Samuel LaSelva, "Justifying Tolerance"

 

Oct 4 -- The Rise of Identity Claims & Recognition: Multiculturalism & Justice

What is the source of identity claims and how do these claims relate to multiculturalism and the politics of recognition?

Required:

Susan Haack, "Multiculturalism and Objectivity," Partisan Review, 62 (3) (1995), pp.397-405.

Charles Taylor, "The Politics of Recognition" in Amy Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp.25-73.

C. Kukathas, "Liberalism and Multiculturalism: The Politics of Indifference," Political Theory, 26 (5) (1998), pp.686-99.

 

Oct 11 - Rawls and Intolerance

Required:

Rawls, A Theory of Justice: selections from Part One (chs 1-3), then emphasize sections 32-35.

Recommended:

John Horton, "Three (Apparent) Paradoxes of Toleration"

DD Raphael, "The Intolerable"

B. Williams, "Tolerating the Intolerable"

 

Oct. 18 - Intolerance 2: Rawls and the Intolerant.

Readings: as for Oct 18th.


Oct. 25 -- MC 2: The Egalitarian Grounds of Difference -- Status and Equality

What is the demand for recognition about? What's the problem with the egalitarian basis of recognition?

Required:

Kymlicka, Multicultural Citizenship, (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1995), Ch.6.

Lawrence Blum, "Recognition, Value and Equality: A Critique of Charles Taylor's and Nancy Fraser's Accounts of Multiculturalism," in C. Willet (ed.) Theorizing Multiculturalism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), pp.73-99.


Recommended:

Maeve Cooke, "Authenticity and Autonomy: Taylor, Habermas, and the Politics of Recognition" Political Theory, 25 (2) (1997), pp.258-88.

Geoffrey B. Levey, "Equality, Autonomy, and Cultural Rights" Political Theory, 25 (2) (1997), pp.215-248

 

Nov 1 - Tolerance 3: Kymlicka vs Rawls on the Scope of Tolerance.

Required:

Kymlicka, Liberalism, Community and Culture, ch 2

Then emphasize Kymlicka, Multicultural Citizenship, ch 8


Recommended:

Don Lenihan, "Liberalism and the Problem of Cultural Membership"

Brian Walker, "Plural Cultures, Conflicted Territories"

Katherine Fierlbeck, "The Ambivalent Potential of Cultural Identity"

Will Kymlicka, "Two Models of Pluralism and Tolerance"

Moshe Halbertal, "Response to Kymlicka"

 

Nov 8 -- Harm & Cultural Rights -- The Interest in Culture & Moral Agency

How can we ground the demand for recognition? What are the social conditions for respect and self-respect in a multicultural

Required:

John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 1971), pp.440- 446

Richard Delgado, "Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets and Name-Calling" Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, v.17 (1982), pp.133-81.

Chandran Kukathas, "Are there any Cultural Rights?" Political Theory, v.20 no.2, (1992), pp.105-39.

Kymlicka, "Reply to Kukathas"

Recommended:

L. Pojman, "On Equal Human Worth: A Critique of Contemporary Egalitarianism," in Louis P. Pojman and Robert Westmoreland (eds.) Equality: Selected Readings, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), p.283.

H. Frankfurt, "Equality as a Moral Ideal," in Frankfurt, The Importance of What We Care About, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp.134-58.

H. Frankfurt, "Equality and Respect," in Frankfurt, Necessity, Volition, and Love (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp.146-54.

 

Nov 15 -- Tolerance 4: Michael Sandel vs Liberal Tolerance.

Required:

Sandel, "Religious Liberty- Freedom of Conscience or Freedom of Choice"

Sandel, Democracy's Discontent, chs 1, 4

John Ladd, "The Concept of Community"

Ronald Dworkin, "Liberal Community"

 

Nov 22 -- MC 4: Cultural Imperative Arguments -- Ambiguity and Motivation

What is the interest in possessing culture?

Required:

Kymlicka, Multicultural Citizenship, (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1995), Ch.5.

Margaret Moore, "Beyond the Cultural Argument for Liberal Nationalism" Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2 (3) (1999), pp.26-47.

 

Nov 29 --MC 5: The Liberal Multicultural Landscape: A New Moral Psychology

Required:

M. Moore, Foundations of Liberalism, (Oxford: The Clarendon Press: 1993), Ch.7.


Dec 13 -- Synthesis and Implications

The seminar will conclude with two sessions (Dec 6 and Dec 13). The Dec 13th session is to make up for the fact that we had to start a week late. These sessions will review certain themes of the seminar in more detail and hopefully in ways that bring the two main topics (multiculturalism and toleration) together. One seminar (at least) will consider how these topics are to be judged, with reference to the implications of the topics for the liberal framework identified in the opening session. There will also be an opportunity for students to present their own papers in these sessions.