Appendix L: Tool for Review of Laboratory Instruction
Peer review of laboratory instruction
Georgetown University School of Medicine
https://georgetown.app.box.com/s/du2op4nkla7srl6qu0rd
Faculty observed: ____________________________________________ Date: ______________________________
|
CONTEXT: (name of course, title of lecture, number of students, etc.) |
|
|
Use the following scale to rate this instructor
5 = Strongly agree 4 = Agree 3 = Neither agree nor disagree 2 = Disagree 1 = Strongly disagree
|
DESIGN OF LEARNING EXPERIENCE |
||
|
A. Learning experiences are relevant to the course curriculum |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
B. Reflects current practice in the field |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
C. Appropriate level of challenge for students |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
D. Goals are clear |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
E. Assessment strategy is appropriate to the goals |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS OR PROCEDURES MATERIALS |
||
|
F. Instructions and procedures are clear |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
G. Appropriate length for time allotted |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
H. Contain information on goals and assessment |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
I. Proofread and in readable format |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
INSTRUCTIONAL OVERSIGHT |
||
|
J. Laboratory instructor shows understanding of the goals and procedures |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
K. Demonstrates the relevant content knowledge needed for the laboratory session |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
L. Takes a proactive role in engaging with the students in the lab |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
M. Is available for questions and assistance |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
N. In helping students, uses clear questioning and coaching strategies |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
O. Can use the equipment and demonstrates the techniques needed for the laboratory |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
P. Follows safety procedures |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
Q. Coordinates work with any laboratory assistants, if present |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
ASSESSMENT |
||
|
R. Assessment procedure is at appropriate level of challenge |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
S. Assessment procedures are clear to students |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
T. Instructor comments on graded work provides ample and helpful feedback |
5 4 3 2 1 |
|
|
Strengths:
|
Weaknesses:
|
|
|
OVERALL COMMENTS:
|
||
Based on this observation, I would rate this instructor overall as:
Exemplary Excellent Good Fair Poor
Faculty Reviewer:______________ Date: ________
(Signature)
Source: Chism, N.V.N. (2007). Peer Review of Teaching: A sourcebook. Bolton, MA: Anker.
Form available at http://som.georgetown.edu/medicaleducation/evaluationandassessment/