Representative Publications (last 5 years)


  • J. Zupko, “Acts and dispositions in John Buridan’s Faculty Psychology,” in N. Faucher & M. Roques (eds.), ‘Habitus’ and ‘Actus’ in Medieval Philosophy. Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind, and Action, Springer, (forthcoming).
  • J. Welchman, “Environmental civil disobedience,” in B. Hall & A. Light (eds.), Routledge Companion to Environmental Ethics, Routledge, (forthcoming).
  • J. Welchman, “Wildlife conservation in the anthropocene: The problem of hybridization conservation in the anthropocene,” in T. DesRoches, F. Jankunis & B. Williston (eds.), New Perspectives in Canadian Environmental Philosophy, McGill University Press, (forthcoming).
  • G. Sutcliffe, F. J. Pelletier and A. Hazen, “Making Belnap's ‘Useful 4-Valued Logic’ Useful,” Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS), AAAI Press, (forthcoming).
  • S. Sinclair, and G. Rockwell, “Python for literary analysis,” in J. O’Sullivan (ed.), Digital Humanities for Literary Studies: Methods, Tools, and Practices, Pennsylvania State University Press, (forthcoming).
  • A. Schmitter, “Where is my mind?: Locating the mind metaphysically in Hobbes,” in R. Copenhaver (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in the Early Modern Age and in the Enlightenment, (History of the Philosophy of Mind series, vol. IV), Routledge, (forthcoming).
  • A. Schmitter, “Cartesian prejudice: Gender, education and authority in Poulain de la Barre,” Philosophy Compass, (forthcoming).
  • A. Rueger, “Pleasure and purpose in Kant's theory of taste,” Kant-Studien, (forthcoming).
  • G. Rockwell and S. Gouglas, “Experiments in alternative/augmented reality game design: Platforms and collaborations,” in K. Kee and T. J. Compeau (eds.), Seeing the Past, University of Michigan Press, (forthcoming).
  • F. J. Pelletier, “The logic for metaphysical conceptions of vagueness,” IFCoLog Journal of Logic and its Applications 4(4) (2018): pp. 1333–1350.
  • M.-E. Morin, “Flesh and Écart in Merleau-Ponty and Nancy,” in I. Goh (ed.), Nancy Among the Philosophers, Fordham University Press, (forthcoming).
  • K. Koslicki, Form, Matter, Substance, Oxford University Press, (forthcoming).
  • A. Hazen and F. J. Pelletier, “Second-order logic of paradox,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, (forthcoming).
  • P. Corkum, “Ancient,” in M. Raven (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding, (forthcoming).
  • P. Corkum, “Empty negations and existential import in Aristotle,” Apeiron, (forthcoming). [Published online 12 Dec. 2017. DOI:]
  • I. Brigandt, “Explanation of molecular processes without tracking mechanism operation,” Philosophy of Science, (forthcoming).
  • K. Bimbó and J. M. Dunn, “Larisa Maksimova's early contributions to relevance logic,” in S. Odintsov (ed.), L. Maksimova on Implication, Interpolation and Definability, (Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol. 15.), Springer Nature, 2018, pp. 36–60.




  • J. Zupko, “John Buridan and Nicole Oresme: Two mid-fourteenth century views on the species of thought,” in C. Grellard (ed.), Mélanges en l'honneur de Joël Biard, Vrin, 2017, pp. 271–283.
  • J. Welchman, “How much is that mammoth in the window?,” Ethics, Policy & Environment 20 (2017): pp. 41–43.
  • S. Sinclair and G. Rockwell, “Visualization,” Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities: Concepts, Models, and Experiments, Modern Languages Association, 2017. [Online at the MLA Commons. URL:]
  • A. Schmitter, “‘I've got a little list:’ Classification, explanation and the focal passions in Descartes and Hobbes,” in R. Stern & A. Cohen (eds.), Thinking about the Emotions: A Philosophical History, Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 109–129.
  • A. Schmitter, “Thomas Hobbes,” in M. Cameron, B. Hill, & R. J. Stainton (eds.), Sourcebook in the History of Philosophy of Language, Springer, 2017, pp. 503–505.
  • A. Rueger, “Analytic of the sublime,” in S. Baiasu & M. Timmons (eds.), The Kantian Mind, Routledge, (forthcoming).
  • A. Rueger, “Kant on beauty and morality c. 1784,” in Proceedings of the XII. International Kant Congress, (forthcoming).
  • G. Rockwell and S. Sinclair, “Watching out for the olympians! Reading the CSEC slides,” in T. Samek & L. Shultz (eds.), Information Ethics and Global Citizenship: Essays on Ideas to Praxis, McFarland, 2017, pp. 46–61.
  • F. J. Pelletier, “Compositionality and concepts – A perspective from formal semantics and philosophy of language,” in J. Hampton & Y. Winter (eds.), Compositionality and Concepts in Linguistics and Psychology, Springer, 2017, pp. 31–94
  • M. Oveisi, J. Delgrande, F. J. Pelletier and F. Popowich, “Kernel contraction and base dependence,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 60 (2017): pp. 97–148.
  • H. Nye, “The wrong kind of reasons,” in T. McPherson & D. Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, Routledge, (forthcoming).
  • M.-E. Morin, “Merleau-Ponty and the challenge of realism, or How (not) to go beyond phenomenology,” in M.-E. Morin (ed.), Continental Realism and Its Discontents, Edinburgh University Press, pp. 137–154.
  • A. Hazen, F. J. Pelletier and Geoff Sutcliffe, “Automated reasoning for the dialetheic logic RM3,” Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS), AAAI Press, 2017, pp. 110–115.
  • S. Green, M. Şerban, R. Scholl, N. Jones, I. Brigandt & W. Bechtel, “Network analyses in systems biology: New strategies for dealing with biological complexity,” Synthese (2017), DOI: 10.1007/s11229-016-1307-6.
  • L. Chwistek, “The tragedy of verbal metaphysics,” translated by A. Trybus and B. Linsky, Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 5(1) (2017): pp. 1–20, URL:
  • I. Brigandt, S. Green & M. A. O'Malley, “Systems biology and mechanistic explanation,” in S. Glennan & P. Illari (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, Routledge, 2017, pp. 362–374.
  • K. Bimbó, “On the decidability of certain semi-lattice based modal logics,” in R. A. Schmidt & C. Nalon (eds.), Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference, TABLEAUX 2017, Brasilia, Brazil, September 25–28, 2017, (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 10501), Springer, 2017, pp. 44–61.



  • J. Welchman, “Attack of the hybrid swarm?,” Ethics, Policy & Environment 18 (2016): pp. 252–255.
  • J. Welchman, “Environmental versus natural heritage stewardship: Nova Scotia’s Annapolis river and the Canadian Heritage river system,” in M. Hourdequin & D. G. Havlick (eds.), Restoring Layered Landscapes: History, Ecology, and Culture, Oxford University Press, 2016.
  • A. Rueger, “Perspectival realism and incompatible models,” Axiomathes 26 (2016): pp. 401–410.
  • F. J. Pelletier, “Semantic compositionality,” in M. Aronoff (ed.), The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Oxford University Press, 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.42.]
  • M.-E. Morin, “Corps propre or corpus corporum: Unity and dislocation in the theories of embodiment of Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Luc Nancy,” Chiasmi International 18 (2016): pp. 353–370.
  • M.-E. Morin, “Worlds apart: Conversations between Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Nancy,” Derrida Today 9(2) (2016): pp. 157–176.
  • B. Linsky, “Propositional logic from the principles of mathematics to Principia Mathematica,” in S. Costreie (ed.), Early Analytic Philosophy: New Perspectives on the Tradition, Springer, 2016, pp. 213–229.
  • K. Koslicki, “Questions of ontology,” in S. Blatti & S. Lapointe (eds.), Ontology After Carnap, Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK), 2016, pp. 220–241.
  • P. Corkum, “Ontological dependence and grounding in Aristotle,” Oxford Handbooks Online in Philosophy, 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.31.]
  • K. Bimbó (ed.) J. Michael Dunn on Information Based Logics, (Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol. 8), Springer Nature, Switzerland, 2016.
  • K. Bimbó, “Some relevance logics from the point of view of relational semantics,” in O. Arieli & A. Zamansky (eds.), Israeli Workshop on Non-classical Logics and their Applications (IsraLog 2014), Special issue of the Logic Journal of the IGPL 24 (2016): pp. 268–287.




    • J. Zupko, “On the several senses of ‘Intentio’ in Buridan,” in G. Klima (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition, and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy, (Medieval Philosophy: Texts and Studies), Fordham University Press, New York, NY, 2015, pp. 251–272.
    • J. Zupko, “Thomas of Erfurt,” in E. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015. [Online at]
    • D. Wishon and B. Linsky, (eds.), Acquaintance, Knowledge, and Logic: New Essays on Bertrand Russell's The Problems of Philosophy, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, 2015.
    • J. Welchman, “Self-love and personal identity in Hume’s Treatise,” Hume Studies 41 (2015): pp. 33–55.
    • F. J. Pelletier, “Discussion: Review of Graham Priest One,” Philosophical Quarterly 65 (2015): pp. 822–830.
    • H. Nye, “Directly plausible principles,” in C. Daly (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods, Palgrave MacMillan, 2015, pp. 610–636.
    • M.-E. Morin, “The spacing of time and the place of hospitality: Living together according to Bruno Latour and Jacques Derrida,” in Deconstruction – Space – Ethics, Special issue of the journal Parallax 21(1) (2015): pp. 267–41.
    • K. Koslicki, “In defense of substance,” in S.Lapointe & B. Rodopi (eds.), Themes from Ontology, Mind, and Logic: Present and Past, Essays in Honour of Peter Simons, Special issue of Grazer Philosophische Studien 91 (2015): pp. 59–80.
    • K. Koslicki, “Where grounding and causation part ways: Comments on Jonathan Schaffer,” Philosophical Studies (2015), DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0436-3.
    • K. Koslicki, “The coarse-grainedness of grounding,” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 9 (2015): pp. 306–344.
    • P. Corkum, “Aristotle on predication,” European Journal of Philosophy 23 (2015): pp. 793–813.
    • I. Brigandt, “Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: Beyond inductive risk,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (2015): pp. 326–356.
    • K. Bimbó, “The decidability of the intensional fragment of classical linear logic,” Theoretical Computer Science 597 (2015): pp. 1–17.
    • K. Bimbó, Proof Theory: Sequent Calculi and Related Formalisms, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015.
    • B. Berendt, M. Büchler and G. Rockwell, “Is it research or is it spying? Thinking-through ethics in big data AI and other knowledge sciences,” Künstliche Intelligenz. [Published online in March, 2015. URL:


    • J. Zupko, “John Buridan,” in E. Zalta, (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, [Online at]
    • A. Rueger, “Idealized and perspectival representations,” Synthese 191 (2014): pp. 1831–1845.
    • A. Schmitter, “The Third Meditation on objective being: Representation and intentional content,” in D. Cunning (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes's Meditations, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 1497–1467.
    • H. Nye, “On the equivalence of trolleys and transplants: The lack of intrinsic difference between direct attack and ‘collateral damage’,” Utilitas 26(4) (2014): pp. 432–479.
    • H. Nye, “Well-being, self-regarding reasons, and morality,” Thought 3(4) (2014): pp. 332–341.
    • B. Linsky, “Leonard Linsky on Russell against Meinong,” Bertrand Russell Society Bulletin 149 (Spring) (2014): pp. 13–18.
    • B. Linsky, “Ernst Mally's anticipation of encoding,” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2(5) (2014): pp. 1–14. [Online at]
    • B. Linsky, “Notes and correspondence for Russell's 1905 Review of Meinong,” Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. 34(1) (2014): pp. 35–62.
    • K. Koslicki, “The causal priority of form in Aristotle,” in R. Sirkel & T. E. Tahko (eds.), Aristotelian Metaphysics: Essence and Ground, Special issue of the journal Studia Philosophica Estonica 7(2) (2014): pp. 113–141.
    • A. Hazen and F. J. Pelletier, “Gentzen and Jaskowski natural deduction: Fundamentally similar but importantly different,” Studia Logica 102 (2014): pp. 1103–1142.
    • Duns Scotus on Time and Existence: The Questions on Aristotle's ‘De interpretatione’, Translated, with an introduction and commentary, by E. Buckner and J. Zupko, The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DC, 2014.
    • P. Corkum, “Presentism, truthmakers and distributional properties,” Synthese 191 (2014): pp. 3427–3446.

    Research areas | Funded projects