Representative Publications (last 5 years)



  • J. Zupko “Intellect and Intellectual Activity in Buridan’s Psychology,” in Critical Essays on the Psychology of John Buridan, ed. Gyula Klima, Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind, and Action 3, Springer, 2017.
  • J. Zupko, “John Buridan and Nicole Oresme: Two Mid-Fourteenth Century Views on the Species of Thought,” in Mélanges en l'honneur de Joël Biard, ed. Christophe Grellard, Vrin, (forthcoming).
  • A. Schmitter, “Passionate openness: Uniting freedom and intelligibility in Cartesian wonder,” in C. Lim & J. Secada (eds.), The Cartesian Mind, Routledge, 2017.
  • A. Schmitter, “Where is my mind?: Locating the mind metaphysically in Hobbes,” in R. Copenhaver (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in the Early Modern Age and in the Enlightenment, (History of the Philosophy of Mind series, vol. IV), Routledge, 2017.
  • A. Schmitter, “Negotiating pluralism in taste and character: Reading the second enquiry with ‘of the standard of taste,’” in J. Taylor (ed.), Reading Hume on the Principles of Morals: Essays on the Second Enquiry, Oxford University Press, 2017.
  • A. Rueger, “Analytic of the sublime,” in: S. Baiasu & M. Timmons (eds.), The Kantian Mind, Routledge, (forthcoming).
  • A. Rueger, “Kant on beauty and morality c. 1784,” in Proceedings of the XII. International Kant Congress, (forthcoming).
  • F. J. Pelletier, “Compositionality and concepts – A perspective from formal semantics and philosophy of language,” in J. Hampton & Y. Winter (eds.), Compositionality and Concepts in Linguistics and Psychology, Springer, 2017.
  • H. Nye, “The wrong kind of reasons,” in T. McPherson & D. Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, Routledge, (forthcoming).
  • M.-E. Morin, “Merleau-Ponty and the challenge of realism, or How (not) to go beyond phenomenology,” in M.-E. Morin (ed.), Continental Realism and Its Discontents, Edinburgh University Press, (forthcoming).
  • A. Hazen & F. J. Pelletier, “Second-order logic of paradox,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, (forthcoming).
  • I. Brigandt, S. Green & M. A. O'Malley, “Systems biology and mechanistic explanation,” in S. Glennan and P. Illari (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, Routledge, 2017.
  • S. Green, M. Şerban, R. Scholl, N. Jones, I. Brigandt & W. Bechtel, “Network analyses in systems biology: New strategies for dealing with biological complexity,” Synthese (2017), DOI: 10.1007/s11229-016-1307-6.
  • K. Bimbó and J. M. Dunn, “Larisa Maksimova's early contributions to relevance logic,” in S. Odintsov (ed.), L. Maksimova on Implication, Interpolation and Definability, (Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol. 10.), Springer Nature, Switzerland, (forthcoming).


  • A. Rueger, “Perspectival realism and incompatible models,” Axiomathes 26 (2016): pp. 401–410.
  • F. J. Pelletier, “Semantic compositionality,” in M. Aronoff (ed.), The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Oxford University Press, 2016.
  • M.-E. Morin, “Corps propre or corpus corporum: Unity and dislocation in the theories of embodiment of Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Luc Nancy,” Chiasmi International 18 (2016): pp. 353–370.
  • M.-E. Morin, “Worlds apart: Conversations between Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Nancy,” Derrida Today 9(2) (2016): pp. 157–176.
  • B. Linsky, “Propositional logic from the principles of mathematics to Principia Mathematica,” in S. Costreie (ed.), Early Analytic Philosophy: New Perspectives on the Tradition, Springer, 2016, pp. 213–229.
  • K. Koslicki, “Questions of ontology,” in S. Blatti & S. Lapointe (eds.), Ontology After Carnap, Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK), 2016, pp. 220–241.
  • P. Corkum, “Ontological dependence and grounding in Aristotle,” Oxford Handbooks Online in Philosophy, 2016 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.013.31.
  • K. Bimbó (ed.) J. Michael Dunn on Information Based Logics, (Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol. 8), Springer Nature, Switzerland, 2016.
  • K. Bimbó, “Some relevance logics from the point of view of relational semantics,” in O. Arieli & A. Zamansky (eds.), Israeli Workshop on Non-classical Logics and their Applications (IsraLog 2014), Special issue of the Logic Journal of the IGPL, 24 (2016): pp. 268–287.


  • J. Zupko, “On the several senses of ‘Intentio’ in Buridan,” in G. Klima (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition, and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy, (Medieval Philosophy: Texts and Studies), Fordham University Press, New York, NY, 2015, pp. 251–72.
  • J. Zupko, “Thomas of Erfurt,” in E. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2015. (Online at
  • D. Wishon and B. Linsky, (eds.), Acquaintance, Knowledge, and Logic: New Essays on Bertrand Russell's The Problems of Philosophy, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, 2015.
  • F. J. Pelletier, “Discussion: Review of Graham Priest One,” Philosophical Quarterly 65 (2015): pp. 822–830.
  • H. Nye, “Directly plausible principles,” in C. Daly (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods, Palgrave MacMillan, 2015, pp. 610–636.
  • M.-E. Morin, “The spacing of time and the place of hospitality: Living together according to Bruno Latour and Jacques Derrida,” in Deconstruction – Space – Ethics, Special issue of the journal Parallax, 21(1) (2015): pp. 267–41.
  • K. Koslicki, “In defense of substance,” in S.Lapointe & B. Rodopi (eds.), Themes from Ontology, Mind, and Logic: Present and Past, Essays in Honour of Peter Simons, Special issue of Grazer Philosophische Studien 91 (2015): pp. 59–80.
  • K. Koslicki, “Where grounding and causation part ways: Comments on Jonathan Schaffer,” Philosophical Studies (2015), DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0436-3.
  • K. Koslicki, “The coarse-grainedness of grounding,” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 9 (2015): pp. 306–344.
  • P. Corkum, “Aristotle on predication,” European Journal of Philosophy 23 (2015): pp. 793–813.
  • I. Brigandt, “Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: Beyond inductive risk,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (2015): pp. 326–356.
  • K. Bimbó, “The decidability of the intensional fragment of classical linear logic,” Theoretical Computer Science 597 (2015): pp. 1–17.
  • K. Bimbó, Proof Theory: Sequent Calculi and Related Formalisms, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015.


  • J. Zupko, “John Buridan,” in E. Zalta, (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (online at
  • A. Rueger, “Idealized and perspectival representations,” Synthese 191 (2014): pp. 1831–45.
  • A. Schmitter, “The Third Meditation on objective being: Representation and intentional content,” in D. Cunning (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes's Meditations, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 1497–67.
  • H. Nye, “On the equivalence of trolleys and transplants: The lack of intrinsic difference between direct attack and ‘collateral damage’,” Utilitas 26(4) (2014): pp. 432–479.
  • H. Nye, “Well-being, self-regarding reasons, and morality,” Thought 3(4) (2014): pp. 332–341.
  • B. Linsky, “Leonard Linsky on Russell against Meinong,” Bertrand Russell Society Bulletin 149 (Spring) (2014): pp. 13–18.
  • B. Linsky, “Ernst Mally's anticipation of encoding,” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2(5) (2014): pp. 1–14. (Online at
  • B. Linsky, “Notes and correspondence for Russell's 1905 Review of Meinong,” Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. 34(1) (2014): pp. 35–62.
  • K. Koslicki, “The causal priority of form in Aristotle,” in R. Sirkel & T. E. Tahko (eds.), Aristotelian Metaphysics: Essence and Ground, Special issue of the journal Studia Philosophica Estonica 7(2) (2014): pp. 113–141.
  • A. Hazen & F. J. Pelletier, “Gentzen and Jaskowski natural deduction: Fundamentally similar but importantly different,” Studia Logica 102 (2014): pp. 1103–1142.
  • Duns Scotus on Time and Existence: The Questions on Aristotle's ‘De interpretatione’, Translated, with an introduction and commentary, by E. Buckner and J. Zupko, The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C., 2014.
  • P. Corkum, “Presentism, truthmakers and distributional properties,” Synthese 191 (2014): pp. 3427–46.


  • J. Zupko, “Using Seneca to read Aristotle: The curious methods of Buridan's Ethics,” in J. Miller (ed.), The Reception of Aristotle's Ethics, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 155–70.
  • J. Zupko, “Universal thinking as process: The metaphysics of change and identity in John Buridan's Intellectio theory,” in R. Keele and C. Bolyard (eds.), Later Medieval Metaphysics: Ontology, Language, and Logic, (Medieval Philosophy: Texts and Studies), Fordham University Press, New York, NY, 2013, pp. 137–58.
  • A. Schmitter, “Passions and affections,” in P. Anstley (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 442–471.
  • H. Nye, “Objective double effect and the avoidance of narcissism,” in M. Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, vol. 3, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 260–286.
  • P. Corkum, “Substance and independence in Aristotle,” in B. Schnieder, A. Steinberg and M Hoeltje (eds.), Varieties of Dependence, (Basic Philosophical Concepts Series), Philosophia Verlag, Munich, 2013, pp. 36–67.
  • P. Corkum, “Aristotle on mathematical truth,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2012): pp. 1057–76.
  • I. Brigandt, “Systems biology and the integration of mechanistic explanation and mathematical explanation,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (2013): pp. 477–492.
  • I. Brigandt, “Intelligent design and the nature of science: Philosophical and pedagogical points,” in K. Kampourakis (ed.), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators, Springer, 2013, pp. 205–238.

  • Research areas | Funded projects